Introduction

The neural background of language learning is still quite uncertain. There is no specific definition for language learning as it concerns too many areas. In simple terms it can be defined as acquiring the ability to communicate in your mother tongue or a second/foreign language.

Recently focus has been put on bilingualism as more and more people are exposed to multiple languages. This is due to a greater exposure with technology, immigration and ethnic diversity.

Neuroplasticity is the reconfiguration of the brain due to environmental needs for “specific motor behaviour or cognitive skills”. These changes later have an influence on developing further competences but it seems that there is an optimal age to obtain skills even though neuroplasticity occurs at all ages (even at senescence).

The method of language learning

The brain regions that are used for langauge development can be found in the inferior frontal and temporal cortices, within these location dominance is seen in the left hemisphere.

It is here in these areas that we can find one of the main components of language learning and development, the ventral and dorsal pathways. The inferior frontal and temporal cortices are connected via these two pathways. The ventral pathways main purpose is for auditory-to-meaning mapping, this is the process in which the brain goes through in connecting the auditory sound of a word to its meaning. The dorsal pathway is needed for supporting auditory-to motor mapping, this is the association between of the sound of the word and the brains skills used for articulatory purposes.

Recently studies have shown that syntactic processing may also heavily rely on the dorsal pathway, in particular when sentences are complex. The temporal cortex is connected to the premotor cortex by the dorsal pathway, which tracks through the inferior parietal cortex (IFC) and parts of the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF). The ventral pathway connects the temporal cortex to Brodmann Area (BA) 44, which is located in the frontal cortex as is specific to humans and other primates, as part of Broca’s area via the arcuate fasciculus (AF). The ventral pathway also seems to be responsible for more than one function: it is assumed to support sound-to-meaning mapping , as well as local syntactic structure building or syntactic processes in general.

The ventral pathway consists of two fiber tracts that run closely together the uncinate fascicles and the extreme capsule fibber system. The uncinate fasciculus , which connects the anterior ventral inferior frontal cortex to the temporal pole, and the extreme capsule fiber system, which mediates the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF), which connects the inferior frontal cortex along the temporal cortex to the occipital cortex.

Currently there are thought to be two functionally and structurally different dorsal pathways. There is also considered to be two ventral pathways in their possible relevance for semantic and syntactic processing during language comprehension.

Auditory perception is the initial stage in the auditory language comprehension process with this taking place in the temporal cortex. It is in the anterior region of Heschl's gurus that auditory processing takes place, this is in the left superior temporal gyrus. Here, we can see where a words phonological form or processing of the auditory word takes place.

With early age development data from diffusion weighted MRI suggest that newborns do not have a fully developed dorsal connection between the superior temporal gyrus to the inferior frontal gyrus. Researchers believe that the dorsal connection is terminated in the premotor cortex. With one connection terminating in the premotor cortex and the other in Brodmann area 44 of Broca’s Area, we can presume that this is the formation of two distinct dorsal pathways. The first dorsal connection to the Premotor cortex , D1, can be seen from birth. It also may be responsible for sensory-to-motor mapping which is necessary for early on language learning. The second dorsal pathway, D2, in the inferior frontal gyrus is not present at birth. Researchers are still uncertain as to how the two different pathways develop. Recent findings from developmental linguistics has shown that at the age of 7 the processing of complex sentences begins. In an experiment carried out by Perani et al,2011, it was proved that the D2 is present in children at the age of 7. However, we must recognise that even though the D2 pathway is complete in children, it is not fully matured. At this age, children are seen to successfully process passive sentence structures or object-first constructions. This may indicate that this dorsal pathway may be supported by Brodmann’s Area 44In our analysis, however, we showed that pathway D2 is present in children at age 7.

The ventral pathway is split into two pathways, similar to the dorsal pathways, the superficial tract (V1) and the deep tract (V2). Scientists have suggested that the superficial tract is involved in the language network terminating I the pars triangularis and pars orbitalis of the inferior frontal gyrus. While the deep tract terminates in 3 frontal regions: An anterior component I the frontal pole and orbitofrontal cortex, a middle component in the middle frontal gyrus and a posterior component in the middle frontal gyrus and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The deep tract of the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus passes through the external capsule while the superficial tract of the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus runs through the extreme capsule and the external capsule. The unciate fasiculus ventral tracts have proven to be useful in language processing. This section connects the anterior temporal lobe and temporal pole to the oribitofrontal cortex. The uncinate fasciculus runs ventrally and laterally into the extreme capsule towards the fibres of the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus. Experiments carried out with diffusion weighted MRI scans showed that the superficial tract was easily identified in both adults and children. With the part of the tract concerning the inferior frontal gyrus, its parieto-occipital ending was more heavily present in children compared to adults. In infants, this tract was also easily differentiated from other areas of the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus. However, it was still not as developed in those of adults and children.

When it came to the deep tract, the DWI scans showed that it was present in infants, children and adults. As regards development, it seemed that in infants the connections between the middle and anterior portions were much shorter than those of children and adults. Futhermore, in adults and children the deep tract reaches forward into the frontal regions connecting to the occipitofrontal cortex, the middle frontal gyrus, the superior frontal gyrus and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

Edit conflict - other version:

Edit conflict - your version:

End of edit conflict

Learning language

Age of acquisition and proficiency are believed to be the two main variables influencing experience-dependent skill learning and brain development.

Evidence shows that both endogenous and experiential factors influence language acquisition.

infant lang dvlp.jpg

However there may be varying optimal periods for different aspects of languages such as phonology, syntax, morphology and semantics.

Phonology begins very early (exposure in utero) and develops extensively in the first year of life. A problem in phonological development in a child may result in reading and spelling difficulties in later child hood.

Infants exposed to two languages from birth are able to differentiate them from very early on, even before they speak their first words.

• by 6 months old they start to lose discrimination of contrasting non-native vowels and consonants. By 9 months old their babbling resembles their native language’s phonetics.

At 12 months they are turned to the language they have been exposed to and will gain an accent undistinguishable from a native speaker.

Bilinguals v Monolinguals

Multilingual individuals must meet demands during language use that monolingual speakers are not faced with. Figuring out what language to speak and swapping between both of their lanuages recquires additional structures.

Asymmetry findings

Analysis on both surface area and thickness asymmetries were conducted. These showed that the anterior cingulate was the only region that differed reliably across groups. Bilinguals had significant rightward asymmetry compared to monolinguals who had more of a leftward asymmetry. These seem mainly due to variations in the thickness of the right hemisphere.

Further tests which explored the effect of L1 proficiency, L2 proficiency, age and age of acquisition and their effects on anterior cingulate thickness asymmetry were run. L1 proficiency was shown to account for most of the variance, as bilinguals which greater L1 proficiency had less rightward asymmetry of the anterior cingulate.

The bilinguals’ rightward asymmetry could be due to enhanced growth or reduced pruning of the right cortex in relation to left. This asymmetry could also reflect greater white matter expansion for the left cingulate in relation to the right. Recently it was discovered that the anterior cingulate is one of the cortical regions with a negative relation between cortical thickness and FA of the underlying superficial white matter. This finding indicates that thinner cortex in this area is associated with increased white matter integrity. However thickness changes may be associated to both grey or white matter so further findings would be needed.

Corpus Callosum

Experiments on the callosal volumes of monolinguals and bilinguals shows no significant difference in the total callosal volume but there are variances in the specific segments. Bilinguals are shown to have larger mid-anterior and central segments. Further analysis shows a significant correlation between the anterior cingulate asymmetry and the combined mid-anterior/central callosal volume. This provides more indication of altered interhemispheric organisation associated with language experience.

(Felton et al., 2017)

Early v Late Bilingualism

There are two types of bilingualism. Simultaneous bilinguals learn two languages at the same time from birth. Sequential bilinguals meanwhile learn their second language later on in life. People acquiring a second language at a later age are rarely able to obtain a native-like accent despite years of practice and high proficiency in other aspects of the language. Simultaneous bilinguals are usually able to speak both languages with a native-like accent although some may occur. For example studies on Korean immigrants in America showed that children had less of an accent that the adults when speaking English However if they were over 6 years old they all still had some detectable accent after 4 years of immersion. 6-14 years old considered sequential bilinguals.

Early bilingualism may lead to the development of new synapses, myelination and pruning of connections of neural circuits. The brain matures with a further development of neural networks. Neural maturation is especially extensive in the first few years of life so this is the period where it would be most sensitive to sensory experiences such as exposure to further languages and so would undergo the most neuroplasticity. When exposed to multiple languages from birth an infant has an increase in their complexity of sociolinguistic and sensorimotor processing so as to better interact with their environment. This leads to the optimal neuroplasticity period lasting longer. Simultaneous and sequential bilingual both undergo brain changes but the substrate it manifests on is different. Macroscopic differences in adults are subtle as they are more apparent on the microscopic level. Overall simultaneous bilinguals have enhanced cognitive and language processes which facilitate overall brain development. Most studies suggest optimal intervals to acquire languages, this being especially important for phonology which is the aspect most affected by age. However others also argue that it is a progressive and linear decline of L2 proficiency potential with age.